There are two sides to everything, and people constantly comment upon that through comparing and contrasting. In A Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens enunciates the duality in France and England around the time of the French revolution. Between his articulate diction and deep characterization, it is evident that Dickens is intentional with every part of his novel so he may convey his motif of duality.
The famous opening helps construct Dickens’ central motif throughout the book. After picking up the book and reading the title, the idea of the two cities is already planted, so Dickens is able to beautifully build off of his title. He constructs a sense of duality between the two cities with anaphora that he uses to construct poetic antithesis over how, “it was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness,” (Dickens 3). Dickens chooses several sets of two direct opposites and frames them to show the duality of the situations in both England and France. The words he uses are simple and delicate, making what he is saying seem matter-of-fact. Throughout the rest of the book, he demonstrates how either side of each comparison may be true in either city depending upon the person.
Dickens also uses various characters to make commentary on duality. One of the characters, Mr. Jarvis Lorry, is constantly traveling between the two cities for work, and he acts as a bridge of information. He introduces a woman named Lucie Manette to her father in France, where another character named Madame Defarge is introduced as an extravagant woman with “a large hand heavily ringed,”(Dickens 23). Dickens describes Lucie as a softer character with “earnest youth and beauty,”(Dickens 48). The two women are fairly different, each with their own challenges. Lucie must overcome her husband’s imprisonment while keeping her father from relapsing, and Madame Defarge is working to make the revolution happen in France. Both women have to deal with “wisdom… foolishness… belief… incredulity… Light… Darkness… hope… [and] despair,”(Dickens 3). Through showing the lives of these two vastly different women, Dickens demonstrates the dualities between two opposite people in two cities.
Throughout A Tale of Two Cities, Dickens works towards showing similarities and differences of life. His intentional words create a delicate tone to effortlessly prove how two feelings can radiate off of any one situation based upon a person and their circumstances.

August 7, 2019 at 2:49 PM
It is true. Britain and France had two very different circumstances. France on one end was on the brink of a revolution, Britain on the other end, not so. With the contrasts in hand, it shows how animalistic a revolution can be, and it shows what could happen in other countries if they oppress their people. That’s just my take as to why Dickens created such a vast Anaphora.
LikeLike
August 12, 2019 at 2:09 AM
First of all, nice analysis! My ongoing problem with Dickens is that he isn’t intentional enough. Duality is masterfully done on Dicken’s part, no doubt about it, but I think he could have told us more or used a few more descriptions to flush out his characters. I think Lucie should have rejected a few guys or at least toyed with Darnay a little bit. Carton should have tried to rehab and then gone back full force. Madame Defarge could have been shown putting up a tomb stone for the village woman’s husband as a sign that she truly cares for the poor. All of those things could have contributed to the duality of these characters, making the job of analysis more interesting and enjoyable to the reader. This is just my little rant because I feel like 300 pages should have given me a bigger bang for my buck.
LikeLike
August 12, 2019 at 5:53 AM
Great analysis! I really enjoyed the comparison (or rather the contrast of) of Lucie and madam Defarge. This is mainly because Madame Defarge was my favorite character in the book. I thought she was intriguing from the very beginning and liked how she slowly gained depth throughout the story.
LikeLike
August 13, 2019 at 2:16 AM
One of the main themes of “A Tale of Two Cities” is the duality presented to the reader, but I think your analysis shines because it shows how the two different settings are similar because of the people that inhabit them, not just the events that transpire. It shows that the place is only defined by the beliefs of the people. I also found your analysis of Mr. Lorry as the bridge between the two cities as eye-opening. I had originally thought the bridge between the cities to primarily be Lucie, but I hadn’t thought about Mr. Lorry’s role like that before.
LikeLike
September 21, 2019 at 6:20 PM
Dickens’ duality is so interesting to investigate as you can explore the ironic tension of the yin and the yang in so many different sections of the novel. However, I think it is just as powerful to explore breaks of the duality. I would consider if Madame Defarge is really Lucie’s foil or rather Miss Pross considering their duel in the climax of the novel. That leaves Lucie without a dual foil unless we consider Sydney Carton and Lucie Manette as two sides of one coin that together can provide redemption for mankind’s evils (represented in Carton) and the purity of Christ (represented in Lucie’s “golden thread”).
LikeLike